The distributions to paid in capital ratio represents the realized returns from a private equity fund, relative to the amounts of called capital
The Distributions to Paid In Capital ratio (or DPI) represents the cumulative distributions paid by a private equity fund to its limited partners, relative to the amount the partners have invested. DPI is also sometimes known as the realization multiple.
Alongside internal rate of return (IRR), DPI is a way to measure a private equity fund’s performance over time and relative to other PE funds. To illustrate DPI, we must first discuss how private equity funds work, as well as some definitions necessary to calculate DPI.
Private equity funds raise committed capital from investors known as limited partners (LP); this capital commitment is legally binding, so it must be honored by the LPs once the capital is “called.” A private equity firm manages the PE fund, looking for suitable acquisitions and investments.
Once the firm finds an investment candidate, it will issue a capital call. It’s at this point where limited partners will invest the cash to help fund the investment. The PE fund will then acquire and hold the investment, usually for three to 10 years, and then sell or “exit” the business through various strategies. It’s at this point that the PE fund can begin distributing proceeds to the limited partners (less any management fees or carried interest the PE firm may earn).
Calculating DPI is a relatively easy and straightforward calculation. It is calculated by taking the total cumulative distributions paid to limited partners divided by the total amount of capital the LPs have invested (the called capital). The mathematical formula is given below:
Assuming the following fact pattern, we can easily calculate DPI:
Called capital (paid in capital): $75 million
Cumulative distributions: $130 million
DPI = $130 million ÷ $75 million = 1.7x
Note the above example uses net distributions to limited partners, which is the industry standard. Therefore, we have assumed the cumulative distributions are net of the PE firm’s management fees and carried interest.
An alternative to DPI is the Total Value to Paid In Capital (TVPI) ratio. The difference between the two formulas lies in the numerator. Whereas the DPI multiple only uses actual, realized distributions paid to LPs, the TVPI ratio includes cumulative distributions plus the unrealized value of any investments that have yet to be exited and distributed. This remaining value is often called the residual value.
The residual value is the value of any investments that have yet to be exited, so there are no proceeds to be distributed. Residual value can be thought of as the unrealized portion of a private equity fund’s investments. Of course, at the end of the fund’s life there will be no more residual value since all investments would have been liquidated and distributed.
Similar to DPI and TVPI, a Residual Value to Paid In Capital (RVPI) can be calculated. In this case the only term in the numerator is the residual value while the denominator will remain the paid in capital.
The DPI multiple is calculated using total cumulative distributions, while the TVPI multiple includes both cumulative distributions and the residual value of unrealized fund assets.
While the total value is nice to know, the timing and amounts of future unrealized profits is unknown, so the TVPI multiple is inherently more theoretical compared to DPI. Since DPI only includes actual distributions to limited partners, it’s a more certain measure of a private equity fund’s actual performance.
Assuming a similar fact pattern as earlier, but including residual value, we can calculate DPI and TVPI:
Called capital: $75 million
Cumulative distributions: $130 million
Residual value: $60 million
DPI = $130 million ÷ $75 million = 1.7x
TVPI = ($130 million + $60 million) ÷ $75 million = 2.5x
Similar to our earlier example, the distributions and residual value are net of the PE firm’s management fees and carried interest.
Some of the advantages to using DPI to analyze private equity returns include:
However, DPI does have its drawbacks:
As with any multiple, DPI should be compared along with other metrics to better evaluate a private equity fund’s performance.
Of course, investors will always want a multiple of greater than 1. This means that the cumulative distributions to investors are greater than the paid in capital. However, to account for the limited partners’ opportunity costs, a good DPI should be well above 1.
If DPI is equal to 1, then investors are not receiving value relative to the amounts invested. Additionally, there is probably value erosion since DPI does not take into account the time value of money. For example, if a limited partner invests $10 million dollars in year 0 and the fund distributes $10 million in year 3, the DPI is 1, but the actual value has eroded since the investment did not even increase to account for the investor’s opportunity cost.
A DPI less than 1 is a red flag since the fund wasn’t successful enough to even return the invested capital.
Having said that, DPI will likely be zero (or low) during the first few years of a fund’s life since it’s unlikely the fund has exited (liquidated) any investments or acquisitions. Therefore, the DPI won’t be meaningful until exits start to happen.
DPI is somewhat similar in concept to a cash-on-cash return (also known as multiple of invested capital or MOIC). However, the cash-on-cash return is calculated on individual investments (in conjunction with the IRR). DPI is based on the total fund’s distributions, which are made up of many different investments.
Additionally, cash-on-cash is typically calculated before accounting for private equity management fees or carried interest. In other words, it is a “gross” metric (gross meaning before fees and PE profits). DPI, on the other hand, is usually calculated on a “net” basis, meaning after fees and PE profits.
We cover cash-on-cash returns in more detail in our LBO Modeling course.
Thank you for reading this CFI guide to Distributions to Paid In Capital. To continue learning and progressing in your career, these additional CFI resources will be helpful:
CFI is a global provider of financial modeling courses and of the FMVA Certification. CFI’s mission is to help all professionals improve their technical skills. If you are a student or looking for a career change, the CFI website has many free resources to help you jumpstart your Career in Finance. If you are seeking to improve your technical skills, check out some of our most popular courses. Below are some additional resources for you to further explore:
Access and download collection of free Templates to help power your productivity and performance.
Already have an account? Log in
Take your learning and productivity to the next level with our Premium Templates.
Upgrading to a paid membership gives you access to our extensive collection of plug-and-play Templates designed to power your performance—as well as CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs.
Already have a Self-Study or Full-Immersion membership? Log in
Gain unlimited access to more than 250 productivity Templates, CFI's full course catalog and accredited Certification Programs, hundreds of resources, expert reviews and support, the chance to work with real-world finance and research tools, and more.
Already have a Full-Immersion membership? Log in